<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wilson vs. Coleman: just a little mistake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/wilson-vs-coleman-just-a-little-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/wilson-vs-coleman-just-a-little-mistake/</link>
	<description>&#34;The extra-ordinary lies within the curve of normality&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: inti Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/wilson-vs-coleman-just-a-little-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[inti Suarez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/archive/wilson-vs-coleman-just-a-little-mistake/#comment-1262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In here there is more than what meets the eye: Wilson is famous indeed, but rejected by many of his colleages. What made Wilson known were his claims on the &quot;emergent properties&quot; of social systems, properties that supposedly could not be seen on the elements level. The thing is that it is still to be shown the real existence of emergent properties, and, on the other side, the reductionist approach of things like population genetics (what I actually do) is very effective at the moment of doing predictions. So I would take with a grain a salt any comment of Wilson on the correct level of analysis. His work on ants is fabulous, his generalizations of it... less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In here there is more than what meets the eye: Wilson is famous indeed, but rejected by many of his colleages. What made Wilson known were his claims on the &#8220;emergent properties&#8221; of social systems, properties that supposedly could not be seen on the elements level. The thing is that it is still to be shown the real existence of emergent properties, and, on the other side, the reductionist approach of things like population genetics (what I actually do) is very effective at the moment of doing predictions. So I would take with a grain a salt any comment of Wilson on the correct level of analysis. His work on ants is fabulous, his generalizations of it&#8230; less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UriShare - Wilson vs. coleman just a little mistake?</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/wilson-vs-coleman-just-a-little-mistake/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UriShare - Wilson vs. coleman just a little mistake?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/archive/wilson-vs-coleman-just-a-little-mistake/#comment-1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Wilson vs. coleman just a little mistake?   In his book `Consilience&#226;€™ Wilson, a founding father of sociolobiology, proposes a unification of scientific method. Basically, this comes down to an analytic method an the acknowledgment of a hierarchical ordering of knowledge. However, when h     Submitted: 2 minutes ago  Category: Science  Submitter: RssFeed   Website: www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl  Report this link: Click here to report   Comments: 0 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wilson vs. coleman just a little mistake?   In his book `Consilience&acirc;€™ Wilson, a founding father of sociolobiology, proposes a unification of scientific method. Basically, this comes down to an analytic method an the acknowledgment of a hierarchical ordering of knowledge. However, when h     Submitted: 2 minutes ago  Category: Science  Submitter: RssFeed   Website: <a href="http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl" rel="nofollow">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl</a>  Report this link: Click here to report   Comments: 0 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
