<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R-Sessions 28: Impressive R Speeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/r-sessions-28-impressive-r-speeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/r-sessions-28-impressive-r-speeds/</link>
	<description>&#34;The extra-ordinary lies within the curve of normality&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Index of the R-Sessions &#124; Curving Normality</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/r-sessions-28-impressive-r-speeds/comment-page-1/#comment-4224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Index of the R-Sessions &#124; Curving Normality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=778#comment-4224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Impressive R Speeds [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Impressive R Speeds [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rense Nieuwenhuis</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/r-sessions-28-impressive-r-speeds/comment-page-1/#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rense Nieuwenhuis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=778#comment-2149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there, Yason,

Indeed, I&#039;ve been puzzled by this one as well. But, fear not: your computer does not travel back in time :-)

Instead, what is represented here, is that your computer has more than a single core, and that apparently some matrix-calculations are distributed over these multiple cores. Thus, in one second of user time, more than a single second-worth of computing time can take place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, Yason,</p>
<p>Indeed, I&#8217;ve been puzzled by this one as well. But, fear not: your computer does not travel back in time <img src="http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/simple-smile.png" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
<p>Instead, what is represented here, is that your computer has more than a single core, and that apparently some matrix-calculations are distributed over these multiple cores. Thus, in one second of user time, more than a single second-worth of computing time can take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yason</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/r-sessions-28-impressive-r-speeds/comment-page-1/#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=778#comment-2148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t quite understand why elapsed time is greater than user+system times in the above examples. In the blog entry you&#039;ve linked in the article, it sound more logical to me: elapsed&gt;user+system. The same is in my experiment (below):

CPU: Intel Core2Duo @ 3.15GHz
L2 Cache: 6Mb
RAM: 4Gb (2x2Gb) @ 800MHz
OS: Windows XP Pro x64
R: 2.8.1 (with Rblas.dll from Athlon64_SSE3)

&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:25) X%*%X)
   user  system elapsed 
   6.97    0.13    7.32 
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:25) solve(X))
   user  system elapsed 
   6.97    0.17    7.50 
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:10) svd(X))
   user  system elapsed 
  34.39    0.41   36.25]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite understand why elapsed time is greater than user+system times in the above examples. In the blog entry you&#8217;ve linked in the article, it sound more logical to me: elapsed&gt;user+system. The same is in my experiment (below):</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core2Duo @ 3.15GHz<br />
L2 Cache: 6Mb<br />
RAM: 4Gb (2x2Gb) @ 800MHz<br />
OS: Windows XP Pro x64<br />
R: 2.8.1 (with Rblas.dll from Athlon64_SSE3)</p>
<p>&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:25) X%*%X)<br />
   user  system elapsed<br />
   6.97    0.13    7.32<br />
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:25) solve(X))<br />
   user  system elapsed<br />
   6.97    0.17    7.50<br />
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:10) svd(X))<br />
   user  system elapsed<br />
  34.39    0.41   36.25</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/r-sessions-28-impressive-r-speeds/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=778#comment-2116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; set.seed(123)
&gt; X  system.time(for(i in 1:25) X%*%X)
   user  system elapsed 
  8.196   0.613   5.256 
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:25) solve(X))
   user  system elapsed 
  8.568   1.436   6.856 
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:10) svd(X))
   user  system elapsed 
 36.042   4.270  55.122 

Hardware Overview:

  Model Name:	MacBook Pro
  Model Identifier:	MacBookPro4,1
  Processor Name:	Intel Core 2 Duo
  Processor Speed:	2.4 GHz
  Number Of Processors:	1
  Total Number Of Cores:	2
  L2 Cache:	3 MB
  Memory:	2 GB]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; set.seed(123)<br />
&gt; X  system.time(for(i in 1:25) X%*%X)<br />
   user  system elapsed<br />
  8.196   0.613   5.256<br />
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:25) solve(X))<br />
   user  system elapsed<br />
  8.568   1.436   6.856<br />
&gt; system.time(for(i in 1:10) svd(X))<br />
   user  system elapsed<br />
 36.042   4.270  55.122 </p>
<p>Hardware Overview:</p>
<p>  Model Name:	MacBook Pro<br />
  Model Identifier:	MacBookPro4,1<br />
  Processor Name:	Intel Core 2 Duo<br />
  Processor Speed:	2.4 GHz<br />
  Number Of Processors:	1<br />
  Total Number Of Cores:	2<br />
  L2 Cache:	3 MB<br />
  Memory:	2 GB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
