<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abortion Activism in 1971 Science?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/feminist-activism-in-1971-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/feminist-activism-in-1971-science/</link>
	<description>&#34;The extra-ordinary lies within the curve of normality&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Partisan Polarization get in the way of Obamas Second Term? &#124; Curving Normality</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/feminist-activism-in-1971-science/comment-page-1/#comment-4366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Partisan Polarization get in the way of Obamas Second Term? &#124; Curving Normality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=593#comment-4366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] culture war couple of years ago, for instance on: &#8220;Dispatches from the culture war&#8221;, the abortion debate in scientific literature, and the often visited &#8220;Paradoxical negative spill over of the catholics attitudes on induced [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] culture war couple of years ago, for instance on: &#8220;Dispatches from the culture war&#8221;, the abortion debate in scientific literature, and the often visited &#8220;Paradoxical negative spill over of the catholics attitudes on induced [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rense Nieuwenhuis</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/feminist-activism-in-1971-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rense Nieuwenhuis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=593#comment-1711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, it is all about the interpretation indeed ... :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, it is all about the interpretation indeed &#8230; <img src="http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/simple-smile.png" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper 't Jong</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/feminist-activism-in-1971-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasper 't Jong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=593#comment-1710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That does seem a plausible explanation for Blake&#039;s conclusion. I guess that we cannot be merely scientists when it comes to preconceived notions. Or rather, we seem to be inclined to explain our findings to accommodate our political views when we are really pro or con to a certain subject, even if we want to stay objective. Though she was proven right and the research was more then adequate, one step seems to be lacking the scientific background. That is, if you&#039;ve interpreted her facts and conclusions in the right way and if I base my conclusion on your explanation of these facts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does seem a plausible explanation for Blake&#8217;s conclusion. I guess that we cannot be merely scientists when it comes to preconceived notions. Or rather, we seem to be inclined to explain our findings to accommodate our political views when we are really pro or con to a certain subject, even if we want to stay objective. Though she was proven right and the research was more then adequate, one step seems to be lacking the scientific background. That is, if you&#8217;ve interpreted her facts and conclusions in the right way and if I base my conclusion on your explanation of these facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
