<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curving Normality graphical update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/curving-normality-graphical-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/curving-normality-graphical-update/</link>
	<description>&#34;The extra-ordinary lies within the curve of normality&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rense Nieuwenhuis</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/curving-normality-graphical-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rense Nieuwenhuis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=651#comment-1825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Inti,

thanks for the comment, and I really appreciate your suggestions. And indeed it was more maximum than minimum design. I have selected another location for the &#039;Pages&#039; column, leaving more white space next to the text. The reason that I want to retain these links, is that Google and other users (;-)) are able to find the content. I&#039;m still trying to find a way to trim down the length of the links-section, for instance by making it context-sensitive.

As you&#039;ve probably seen, the header images alternate. I&#039;m still trying to find out what works well, and what doesn&#039;t. Perhaps the more singular, strong images work better indeed. 

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Inti,</p>
<p>thanks for the comment, and I really appreciate your suggestions. And indeed it was more maximum than minimum design. I have selected another location for the &#8216;Pages&#8217; column, leaving more white space next to the text. The reason that I want to retain these links, is that Google and other users (;-)) are able to find the content. I&#8217;m still trying to find a way to trim down the length of the links-section, for instance by making it context-sensitive.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;ve probably seen, the header images alternate. I&#8217;m still trying to find out what works well, and what doesn&#8217;t. Perhaps the more singular, strong images work better indeed. </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inti Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/curving-normality-graphical-update/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[inti Suarez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/?p=651#comment-1822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Rens

That moving tag cloud looks really good. But two columns of small blue letters? If you ask me, I get already visually tired before I even begin to look at it. According to me, the great lesson of google is that with a reasonably good search function you don&#039;t need indexes any longer. So why here such a dominant space for indexes? 

And talking about visual assault... I must say that the lots of words on top do not help in giving me some relax. 

In general, if I visit your blog is primarily because I want to read your thinking. GIve that a prominent and confortable place. The tag cloud can function as index, so get rid, or minimize the columns. 

Now, of course all this boils down to esthetics. And as you can see in the design of my blog and my page... I&#039;m all for minimalist designs. Perhaps you don&#039;t want to go the whole nine yards to a minimal design... but consider making a blog page more... relaxed to the eye. 

Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rens</p>
<p>That moving tag cloud looks really good. But two columns of small blue letters? If you ask me, I get already visually tired before I even begin to look at it. According to me, the great lesson of google is that with a reasonably good search function you don&#8217;t need indexes any longer. So why here such a dominant space for indexes? </p>
<p>And talking about visual assault&#8230; I must say that the lots of words on top do not help in giving me some relax. </p>
<p>In general, if I visit your blog is primarily because I want to read your thinking. GIve that a prominent and confortable place. The tag cloud can function as index, so get rid, or minimize the columns. </p>
<p>Now, of course all this boils down to esthetics. And as you can see in the design of my blog and my page&#8230; I&#8217;m all for minimalist designs. Perhaps you don&#8217;t want to go the whole nine yards to a minimal design&#8230; but consider making a blog page more&#8230; relaxed to the eye. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
